1 Mental contamination : The perpetrator effect
نویسندگان
چکیده
In order to test the proposition that imagining carrying out an unacceptable non-consensual act can evoke contamination-related feelings in the perpetrator, 4 connected experiments were carried out involving male students. The effects of the experimental procedure were enhanced by the introduction of a theme of betrayal which boosted the feelings of contamination and urges to wash. The non-consensual scenarios were followed by substantial increases in negative emotions, notably shame, disgust and guilt, and these increases were boosted over successive enhancements of the procedure. Overall the results show that perpetrators of (imagined) unacceptable acts report a range of negative emotions and feelings of dirtiness. The main conclusion of this research is that imagining an unacceptable, non-consensual act can produce feelings of contamination. It is an experimental illustration of mental contamination, that is, contamination which is evoked by a mental event without any contact with a tangible contaminant.
منابع مشابه
Disgust as a unique affective predictor of mental contamination following sexual trauma.
Mental contamination has been described as an internal experience of dirtiness that can arise and persist in the absence of contact with observable physical contaminants. Recent research has examined mental contamination specifically related to unwanted physical contact and sexual trauma. This study evaluated the degree to which disgust propensity and both self-focused and perpetrator-focused p...
متن کاملDo You Say Something When It’s Your Boss? The Role of Perpetrator Power in Prejudice Confrontation
Two experiments examined the role of perpetrator power in witnesses’ decision to confront a prejudicial remark. In Experiment 1, participants who witnessed a sexist remark by a higher-power (vs. an equal-power) perpetrator were significantly less likely to express confrontation intentions, despite finding the remark highly biased and inappropriate. In Experiment 2, participants read scenarios i...
متن کاملThird-party forgiveness: (not) forgiving your close other's betrayer.
Building on attribution and interdependence theories, two experiments tested the hypothesis that close friends of victims (third parties) are less forgiving than the victims themselves (first parties). In Experiment 1, individuals imagined a scenario in which either their romantic partner or the romantic partner of a close friend committed the identical relationship offense. Third parties were ...
متن کاملمعیارهای سنجش بیمبالاتی؛ معیار شخصی یا نوعی؟
In criminal law, subjective and objective criteria are of importance criteria for establishing of criminal responsibility. Subjective criterion of establishing of criminal responsibility only focuses on wrongdoer, his personal characteristics and his mental state. In contrast, objective criterion of criminal responsibility regardless of perpetrator characteristics and his point of view focuses ...
متن کاملMental health correlates of the victim-perpetrator relationship among interpersonally victimized adolescents.
This research examines mental health correlates of different victim-perpetrator relationships among adolescent victims of interpersonal violence. A large and nationally representative sample of adolescents (N = 4,023) responded to structured telephone interviews concerning mental health functioning (posttraumatic stress disorder-PTSD, major depressive disorder, substance abuse/dependence, and d...
متن کامل